![]() He said the fair use defense for most people doing this is "pretty good," though it depends largely on the circumstances. And I think that the best case for streaming comes in that last category, where somebody who legally has access to it is sharing it with a small group so they can watch together." "There is-let's call it the 'small uses,' the quotations and quotes and clips there is 'satire, parody, transformation ' and there is one thing I think of as 'reasonable, normal consumer uses,' which can include all media, provided it's very personal and appropriately limited to things you already had some kind of access to. ![]() "Fair use comes in a couple of flavors," the professor said. However, Grimmelman explored some possible defenses, the most effective of which he thinks is simple fair use doctrine. The courts shut that argument down, ruling that Aereo was engaged in public performance, which means Zoom and Discord users streaming movies today (not to mention the companies themselves) might find themselves similarly subject to the Copyright Act. Aereo argued that it wasn't engaged in "public performance" of broadcast material, in part because it used separate antennae to stream to individual users at those users' direction, as opposed to one large stream that multiple users tapped into. The professor brought up the 2014 saga of Aereo, a company that was effectively capturing cable TV broadcasts and transmitting them to its own subscribers online. However, the drafters of the "Transmit Clause" added to US copyright law in a massive 1976 revision failed to consider "the possibility of what you might call 'private transmitted performances,'" which is how streaming movies to small groups of friends might reasonably be categorized, according to Grimmelmann. In a "narrow analysis" of copyright law, Grimmelmann said, any "transmission" of copyrighted material is designated a "public performance," and is subject to specific laws. We weren't expecting a simple answer, and unsurprisingly, he said, in short, "it's complicated." To find out, we contacted James Grimmelmann, a professor of law at Cornell Tech and Cornell Law School who specializes in internet and intellectual property law. Now Playing: Best Shows And Movies To Stream For May 2020 - Netflix, Hulu, Shudder, Amazon Prime Video Student vs.By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's.There are some matters this program does not handle, including but not limited to: The goal of the program is to provide short and basic free consultations for students (particularly at times of significant need in their lives), and not to provide long-term representation.Įach attorney is also a notary public. These consultations are limited to 1-3 hours per matter. What Sort of Consultations Are Available:Ĭonsultations are available regarding the following matters: This includes undergraduate and graduate/professional students. Only current University at Buffalo students are eligible to use this service. Make your appointment at the bottom of this page. ![]() Legal ConsultationsĪttorneys are available to provide free legal consultations to UB students as follows. An attorney affiliated with this program, Shaqurah Zachery, will email you at your UB email address prior to the appointment with important information. ![]() Make sure to include your phone number in the appropriate field. If you are a UB student interested in a legal consultation, please sign up for one below. All other aspects of the program, including terms and hours of operation, remain the same. Effective immediately, d ue to the recent developments with the COVID-19 pandemic, Legal Consultations will be provided remotely only (usually by telephone). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |